Grading Scale

QAG Grading Scale

A 1–10 scale that explains both the card’s condition and the evidence behind it. The overall grade is not an automatic copy of the lowest subgrade.

  • Two 10 tiers
  • 0.5 steps
  • Evidence first
Sumi-e inspection study showing a card measured through multiple evidence fields
A grade is a reading of evidence

01—03

Read the number correctly

Subgrades show where a card is strong and where defects appear. The overall grade is a separate decision that considers subgrades, defect severity, and the card’s presentation as a whole.

01

Four pillars

Centering, Corners, Edges, and Surface are the four core inspection fields.

02

Front + back

Front and back values stay visible; each pillar uses (front + back) ÷ 2, floored to QAG’s 0.5 ladder.

03

Final grade

The overall grade is not a raw sum or a single minimum; it is published after review.

HOW TO READ

A subgrade is evidence—not the final verdict

One subgrade of 9 does not mechanically force an overall 9. Conversely, a severe defect can limit the grade ceiling even when the other pillars are strong.

  1. 01

    Measure the evidence

    Review the relevant images and measurements for both sides.

  2. 02

    Score each pillar

    Summarize Centering, Corners, Edges, and Surface independently.

  3. 03

    Set the overall grade

    Consider balance, defect weight, and the limiting factor before publication.

QAG SCALE

Card condition levels

QAG uses a 10-point scale in 0.5 increments, with two distinct 10 tiers. Paired pillar scores use (front + back) ÷ 2, floored to that ladder. These condition names describe QAG’s own scale and do not promise a one-to-one cross-grade with another company.

  1. 10KAMI

    QAG’s highest tier: virtually flawless under detailed review and clear of all KAMI gates.

  2. 10Pristine

    A 10 with premium condition that does not meet one or more KAMI conditions.

  3. 9.5Gem Mint

    Premium condition with only extremely minor issues found under close inspection.

  4. 9Mint

    Sharp and clean, with minor issues that do not undermine the overall presentation.

  5. 8.5Near Mint–Mint+

    Very strong condition with minor manufacturing or handling issues.

  6. 8Near Mint–Mint

    Very good condition with light evidence of handling visible on close review.

  7. 7.5Near Mint+

    Several light signs of wear, while the overall presentation remains strong.

  8. 7Near Mint

    More visible wear, but the card still presents well.

  9. 6.5Excellent–Mint+

    A moderate small flaw or several minor flaws are visible.

  10. 6Excellent–Mint

    Manufacturing or handling wear is clearly more apparent.

  11. 5.5Excellent+

    Multiple issues are present, while the card remains presentable.

  12. 5Excellent

    Visible wear and surface or edge issues affect the presentation.

  13. 4.5Very Good–Excellent+

    Several issues combine and begin to affect eye appeal.

  14. 4Very Good–Excellent

    More advanced wear is present, including possible light pressure marks or creases.

  15. 3.5Very Good+

    A significant flaw is present, but the card remains clearly legible and viewable.

  16. 3Very Good

    Multiple visible flaws materially affect the overall presentation.

  17. 2.5Good+

    Some heavy damage is present, such as a clear crease or advanced wear.

  18. 2Good

    Multiple heavy creases or substantial wear are present.

  19. 1.5Fair

    One or more severe defects are present.

  20. 1Poor

    Heavy damage substantially affects the card’s structure or presentation.

KAMI 10 is QAG’s highest tier. Pristine 10 is a 10 that does not meet one or more KAMI conditions.

PUBLIC METHODOLOGY

A report should be traceable

Every published score should lead back to approved evidence. QAG shows subgrades, front and back values, the limiting factor, and the appropriate review images without exposing private scanner data.

QAG is independent and is not affiliated with PSA, BGS, CGC, TAG, or any card publisher.